This website is intended for Medical Professionals only. By using this site you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

News
Keep it pumping Series - Episode 3       This is the third in a six-part series ... (20 Oct 2018)
Keep it pumping Series - Episode 2       This is the first in a six-part series ... (20 Oct 2018)
Keep it pumping Series - Episode 1 This is the first in a six-part series dealing with Heart ... (20 Oct 2018)
CHRONIC VENOUS DISEASE Log on to TheSynapse eLearning for a deeply insightful ... (20 Oct 2018)
Wednesday, 18 April 2018 18:41

Measuring the risks of extreme temperatures on public health Featured

Rate this item
(0 votes)

Extreme hot and cold weather increase the number of deaths and emergency room visits but affect specific at-risk populations differently, according to new research from the U.S. and Japan.

The study, published in the journal Risk Analysis, found that extreme cold increased mortality and morbidity risks for people with cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, while extreme heat was risky for people with renal diseases. “We analyzed the data from Twin Cities, Minnesota, in the U.S., and found patterns with universal validity across the globe,” says Matteo Convertino, an Associate Professor of Hokkaido University who led the study. The results highlight the potential for tailoring public service messages for people with specific health conditions.

While well known that extreme weather can be dangerous, not enough analysis has been done to compare specific temperatures against deaths and disease to know when public service messaging will be most effective.

Convertino teamed up with the University of Minnesota Twin Cities and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine which critical temperatures should trigger critical public health warnings. The Twin Cities are known for their harsh winters and hot, humid summers. The team gathered extreme temperature data and compared it to deaths in the city between 1998 and 2014 and emergency department visits from 2005 to 2014.

They found that the relative risk for mortality and morbidity increased generally with more extreme temperatures, but that at-risk populations were affected differently depending on their health conditions. Risk for people with cardiovascular disease or respiratory illness increased in the winter, but not significantly in the summer, which was the opposite for people with renal diseases. Diabetics showed no clear response to extreme temperature. They also found that percentile-based temperature thresholds and heat index are more appropriate than absolute temperatures for determining when to initiate emergency risk communications.

“Considering climate variability over space and time, tailored emergency risk communication programs are extremely important for informing the general public about potential health risks, such as severe heat waves or cold snaps, and how individuals can protect themselves. Our model can determine such temperature thresholds to start risk communications, which is important for saving human lives,” says Convertino.


Source: Hokkaido University

Full bibliographic information

Liu Y. et al., Threshold evaluation of emergency risk communication for health risks related to hazardous ambient temperature. Risk Analysis, April 10, 2018. 

 

Read 445 times Last modified on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 19:43

Latest news

Highlights

  • Dermfest 2018

    Dermfest is fast approaching.

    Have you registered?

    If not click on the video to know more about this year's event. 

    Written on October 19, 2018 Read more...

Join

Connect with other Medical Professionals on fb in a closed facebook group

captcha  

Login

Template Settings

Theme Colors

Cyan Red Green Oranges Teal

Layout

Wide Boxed Framed Rounded
Patterns for Layour: Boxed, Framed, Rounded
Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…