This website is intended for Medical Professionals only. By using this site you confirm that you are a healthcare professional.

News
Interactive Discussion on Valsartan     The Malta Medicines Authority in collaboration with the ... (21 Jul 2018)
Caffeine affects food intake at breakfast, ... Findings of a new study published in the Journal of the Academy ... (17 Jul 2018)
New approach to treating infectious diseases ... Osaka University scientists clarify how E.coli bacteria attach ... (17 Jul 2018)
The more you smoke, the greater your risk of ... The more you smoke, the greater your risk of atrial ... (17 Jul 2018)
New Cochrane health evidence challenges ... New evidence shows there is little or no effect of omega 3 ... (17 Jul 2018)

Large Study Shows Little Difference Between ‘Old’ and ‘New’ CPR in Cardiac Arrest

cpr5Continuous chest compression, touted as the new way to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation, was not an improvement over standard CPR, according to findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The University of Alabama at Birmingham was one of eight United States and Canadian universities involved in the study, the largest such study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest ever conducted.
The study looked at more than 23,000 adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, for whom EMS crews responded. Those patients were randomized in the eight participating communities to either standard CPR or continuous chest compression. Standard CPR, known as 30:2, is 30 chest compressions with a pause for two ventilations, or breaths. CCC CPR is uninterrupted chest compressions with one ventilation every 10 compressions without a pause.
“We did not see any significant difference in neurologically intact survival to hospital discharge between patients receiving standard 30:2 CPR compared to those receiving CCC,” said Henry Wang, M.D., professor in the UAB Department of Emergency Medicine and a study co-author. “The neurologically intact survival rate for patients receiving 30:2 CPR was 7.7 percent, against 7 percent for those receiving CCC.”
The neurologically intact standard means that, upon discharge from the hospital, a patient has no significant cognitive deficit and can return to near-normal function.
“There have been some smaller-scale studies that suggest CCC was as effective or perhaps more effective than 30:2; but until now, that had never been tested in a full-scale, randomized clinical trial,” Wang said. “The current results indicate that 30:2 and CCC are equally effective. Further evaluation of the role of ventilation in CPR is warranted.”
Wang says that, over the past 10 years, CCC has been suggested as an easier and safer way for an individual to perform CPR.
“In the absence of differences in patient outcomes between the two CPR strategies, the study’s conclusion is that EMS practitioners and their medical directors should decide on an individual basis if they will perform 30:2 or continuous chest compressions,” said Shannon Stephens, an instructor in the Department of Emergency Medicine and a study co-author.
The study, which began in June 2011 and ran through May 2015, was conducted by the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium, a group of United States and Canadian research institutions.



Source Newsroom: University of Alabama at Birmingham
Citations
NEJM, 11-9-15

TheSynapse Videos

0
0
0
0
0
0

Highlights

  • Interactive Discussion on Valsartan

     

     

    The Malta Medicines Authority in collaboration with the Superintendence
    of Public Health and the Department of Pharmacy University of Malta
    would like to cordially invite you to an interactive scientific discussion:

     

     


    THE VALSARTAN SAGA


    SCIENCE | MYTHS | REALITIES

     


    led by Professor Anthony Serracino Inglott

     


    Date: Wednesday 25 July 2018

     


    Time: 20:00
    Venue: Conference Room, Life Sciences Park, San Ġwann

     


    Refreshments will be served


    RSVP: info.medicinesauthority@gov.mt | 23439202

    Written on July 21, 2018
  • WASP Course in Bahrain

    WASP Course, led by Prof Victor Grech and Prof Charles Savona Ventura, has recently organised a course in Bahrain. Co-hosted with Arabian Gulf University, the course, on how to write a scientific paper, focused on quantitative analysis methods and was targeted for medical doctors and allied health professionals.

    Written on April 24, 2018 Read more...

Join

Connect with other Medical Professionals on fb in a closed facebook group

captcha  

Login

Template Settings

Theme Colors

Cyan Red Green Oranges Teal

Layout

Wide Boxed Framed Rounded
Patterns for Layour: Boxed, Framed, Rounded
Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…